Compared to Battlefield 4, Rivals appears to have both somewhat harder edges (missing anti-aliasing) and to be spongier (no anisotropic filtering, some weaker textures). In order to offer buyers the best visuals possible, the developer Ghost Games turned to DICE's Frostbite 3 Engine. Or did the party responsible forget that you can tailor the game's settings to your own hardware?Īpart from a few disconnects, the game's graphics made a good or perhaps even a very good impression on us. But it still eludes us as to why EA didn't cap the frame rate a little higher, and why they had to penalize owners of more potent hardware. Mouse support doesn't seem to have been on the developers' radar.Īccording to the publisher, Electronic Arts, their goal was to make competition between players fairer ( Rivals combines single and multiplayer elements) and not put players with weaker hardware at a disadvantage. Some gamers will simply shake their heads in disbelief at the fact that to reach the graphics options from the garage, you have to hit either the Page Up or Page Down key twice. We don't just mean the annoying tutorials for the Racer and Cop campaigns - those can't be avoided on consoles either… see this YouTube video for a humorous edit - but more than anything we mean the strange key assignments and (from the point of view of a PC gamer) the uncomfortably-arranged menu. You notice the PC version's defective operation almost immediately. There's no hiding the fact that Need for Speed: Rivals (like most games) was developed primarily for consoles. For the original German article, see here.
0 Comments
1/2/2023 0 Comments E cad n cad and p cad* These costs vary widely so we quoted a simple, single license that allows for small to medium size/complexity designs with no special add-ons or features. Integration with PCB footprint and PCB libraryĭefining other layers around footprint (silkscreen, keepout, solder mask, courtyard, etc.) Placing and editing electrical objects (wire, ports, etc.)ĭefining connection type and descriptions Ideal for (hobbyists, professionals, everyone) Whichever PCB design software you select, reference our PCB School for additional electronic design tips: Other Articles & The San Francisco Circuits Advantage The dates we reviewed the software are found below:Īltium Designer: September 2016, version 16 New features, fixes or changes may have been released that weren't available at the time of our review. It was pointed out to us, quite accurately, that it's important to note the program versions and review dates to provide some context to the date this article is being read. Keep in mind that everyone will have a different preference so our opinions may not align with your needs and ultimate favorite. You’ll find that most programs have all the features you’re looking for, so the ease-of-use factor is most strongly considered. This is important for team collaboration when the engineer’s skills are scaled to larger, wide-spread applications.įinally, we consider the various feature sets and which programs are better for which applications. Stephan’s easiness metric, the software should be a standard and widely used platform in the industry. When you have to click 5 times, move the mouse 5cm to the right and 4cm to the left to do a simple thing, and you have to do this simple thing one hundred times on your PCB. Why? Well because a good portion of the time you spend routing your PCB (time is money) is the time taken to perform simple actions. “A PCB routing software should be easy to use.To define that subjective criteria, I'd like to propose here a simple 'easiness measurement metric' defined as number of clicks + number of keystrokes + mouse moving distance to perform a given function. Cadence article to encompass our primary grading criteria: We really like this excerpt from Mathieu Stephan’s (AKA limpkin) excellent Altium vs. We also have biases for software that we’re extremely comfortable with compared to programs that we have had very little work with. It’s important to establish the criteria we’re using - which is, inevitably, subjective. This guide is structured to help you decide which is optimal or explore alternatives. Ultimately, your needs and preferences should drive what CAD program you use. They range from free or inexpensive to high-end/premium.Īll of the tools are different and unique in their own way. There are several programs available that range from simple and intuitive to highly sophisticated. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |